Aptana ide manual#
Aptana ide full#
Aptana ide code#

Sadly, there wasn't much visible activity in the DLTK, so I talked to its project lead Andrey Platov: Talking about TCL, we think DLTK TCL is already one of the best TCL IDEs around. The Ruby is one of the oldest DLTK languages and, together with TCL, belongs to the core of DLTK. The dynamic languages toolkit is in an interesting position insofar as they try to unite all reusable components a dynamic language IDE on Eclipse needs into one framework and hence make it easier to implement support for a new language. The Aptana or RadRails tags list more related content about the Aptana IDE.

Aptana ide manual#

While the refactorings aren't fool proof and correct for all situations, they work for most common cases and are a huge improvement over doing manual copying and pasting (note that the author of this text worked on the implementation). The Ruby development tools have had refactoring support for quite some time now, implementing for example various rename refactorings, extracting, moving and inlining of methods. The next step involves moving the Studio to the current Eclipse Ganymede release, 'add some more advanced Cloud support, fix more big bugs and then in the 1.3.x RadRails timeframe I'll probably be able to take a breath and plan out what's next again.' We're all ears: let us know what you'd like to see. If we see enough support out there we'd certainly pursue it. Which language will be next? Well we're always looking for what the community would like in terms of web development plugins. Note: the JRuby Eclipse scripting functionality was discussed previously on InfoQ.Īptana now has support for Ruby, JavaScript, Python, and PHP.

Aptana ide full#

And if they're a JRuby expert then they could probably write their own extensions to hook into with Ruby and access the full Eclipse APIs.

Aptana ide code#

Ruby developers who want to extend their IDE don't have to program Java: We do have a plugin that allows end users to write Ruby code against a small set of the Eclipse Editor API - so people could actually help out quite a bit by writing small macros/scripts with that if they only know Ruby. Now that Cloud is officially out I'll be working on getting Rails supported and then I'll be able to go back to RDT/RadRails more or less full-time.Ĭhris also told me that they are looking for more people to hire, 'to make sure that we can keep development steadily going on the plugins'. Over this time I've basically been doing some bugfixing and starting to integrate some Cloud support into the tooling when I find small pieces of time. As a result I haven't been able to commit as much time as I normally do to Ruby support or RadRails. I've been doing all of the work on the API/server that coordinates between Aptana Studio, the 3rd party hosting provider(s), and the actual boxes themselves that host the websites. There wasn't much visible activity on Aptana's Ruby Studio, so we caught up with Chris to learn what's currently happening: For the past 6 or 7 months now I've been working on our new offering: Aptana Cloud. RDT and RadRails have both been integrated into Aptana Studio some time ago, and RDT's main developer, Chris Williams, has been hired by Aptana. The Eclipse based Ruby development tools have been around for many years and were widely used, particularly in Rails development through the extensions provided by RadRails. The ability to do automated refactoring is a good indicator for the maturity of an IDE because it involves detailed and non-trivial analysis of the source code and is one of the features a language-agnostic editor cannot provide easily and without third-party tools.

We assume that all IDEs handle the basics like highlighting and therefore put our focus on more sophisticated features like refactoring. Still, sometimes it is handy to have an integrated development environment that covers all daily tasks of a developer, starting from the interaction with the source code management tool, navigation in the project files, but also compiling, debugging and deployment of the project.įor this series, we interviewed several people who work on IDEs for dynamic languages, to give an overview and a feeling on the current state of these IDEs. Fortunately, programs written in these languages generally tend to be shorter and less verbose than for example in Java. One reason is certainly the lack of tools that are on par with their static peers, simply because building tools for dynamic languages is much harder. In the dynamic languages world, the case isn't so clear. Few developer would attempt to write Java oder C# code without an IDE that assists with code completion, an intelligent formatter or automated refactoring.